LABOR & EMPLOYMENT
Representation of Employers
Employers face an ever-growing list of federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations concerning employment activities. In addition to providing representation to employers in litigated matters, we will advise you on how to avoid costly employment-related litigation. We work closely with human-resources personnel to review employment policies and evaluate the need for updating and revising existing policies. We can also represent you through all aspects of labor management relations, including labor agreement negotiation and labor arbitration. We will help you negotiate the employment law labyrinth, including the following areas:
- Discrimination, retaliation, and harassment
- Wage and hour issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act
- Family and medical leave
- Disability issues
- Employment restrictive covenants, including non-compete, non-solicitation, non-disclosure, and no-hire agreements
- Employee benefit issues
- Charges of discrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and State agencies
- Employment contracts, employee handbooks, manuals, application forms and employment policies and procedures
Representation of Employees
Employees who have lost their jobs, or who are subjected to unlawful acts of discrimination, retaliation or harassment in the course of employment need immediate legal assistance in order to protect their rights. Losing a job or having to tolerate illegal working conditions is highly stressful. We will work with employees who are experiencing these problems to stop unlawful workplace conduct before it causes additional economic or emotional harm. For those who have already lost a job, we will pursue all remedies to compensate the employee for the losses they have sustained. We have successfully represented employees in the following areas of employment law:
- Discrimination, retaliation and harassment
- Wage and hour issues
- Disability issues
- Employee benefit issues
- Family and Medical Leave
- Employment contracts
- Contracts not to compete or engage in competitive activity
Back to all Practice Areas
EXPERIENCED ATTORNEYS
John M. Lawhorn
Attorney
Mary Elizabeth Maddox
Attorney
Richard T. Scrugham, Jr.
Attorney
Jamey M. Minnihan
Attorney
Related Blogs
ARE CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS SUBJECT TO UPCOMING CHANGES TO FEDERAL WAGE AND HOUR LAWS?
I have posted twice since the beginning of this year [February 18, 2016] and [May 20, 2016] concerning upcoming changes in federal wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) guarantees covered workers a minimum hourly wage and overtime pay at a rate of 1.5 times their base hourly rate for hours worked […]
Federal Appeals Court Refuses to Extend Title VII Protection to Claim of Sexual Orientation Discrimination
In the last year, I have twice posted on the topic of whether federal statutory protections against discrimination on account of “sex” will be extended to claims of sexual orientation discrimination. [10/29/15 and 3/21/16 posts] This topic became a regular subject of discussion among employment law practitioners and their clients following the U.S. Supreme Court’s […]
WAGE GARNISHMENTS FOR TENNESSEE EMPLOYERS JUST BECAME MORE COMPLICATED
In April 2016 Governor Haslam signed a bill that became effective September 1, 2016, which will likely increase the number of wage garnishments with which many Tennessee employers will have to contend. This is particularly true for employers that make regular use of independent contractor workers. A wage garnishment is a debt collection process set […]
TENNESSEE EMPLOYERS WITH 50 OR MORE EMPLOYEES MUST USE E-VERIFY SYSTEM BY JANUARY 1, 2017
Before 2011, Tennessee employers only had to worry about federal immigration law requirements for verifying employee eligibility to work. Beginning in 1986, employers were required by federal law to have all newly hired employees complete a Form I-9 and provide one of several possible documents to prove U.S. citizenship or lawful presence in the United […]
U.S. Department of Labor Issues Final Rule Implementing Changes to Overtime Laws
In a February 2016 blog post, I discussed an anticipated major change in the criteria for determining who can be exempt from payment of overtime wages. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) guarantees payment of overtime wages at a rate of 1.5 times the base hourly rate of pay for all hours worked in excess […]
Many States and Now the Federal Government Are Questioning Use of Overreaching Non-Compete Agreements
It seems that the use, or more specifically, the over use and abuse of employee non-compete agreements is now in the crosshairs of several state legislatures and the federal government. Over the past few years some states have enacted statutes limiting such agreements and banning them outright in some industries. In March 2016, the United […]
Most Employers Should Consider Having an OSHA Safety Consultant
The reach of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) extends literally into every work place. Clearly, employers in the construction, manufacturing and healthcare industries, as well as those whose employees work with or around machinery and toxic chemicals must consciously address OSHA compliance on a daily basis. Many employers outside these obviously regulated industries […]
EEOC Files Its First Lawsuits to Extend Title VII Coverage to LGBT Employees Who Claim Discrimination Due to Sexual Orientation
In an October 2015 post, I discussed whether the federal statute that prohibits discrimination on account of “sex” may be extended to protect employees who suffer discrimination or harassment due to their sexual orientation. Will Protections Against Sex Based Discrimination Be Extended to Sexual Orientation? There currently are no federal or Tennessee anti-discrimination statutes that […]
Major Change in Criteria for Determining Who Can Be an Overtime Exempt Employee Expected This Year
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was enacted in 1938 for the primary purposes of guaranteeing workers a minimum hourly wage and overtime pay at a rate of 1.5 times their base hourly rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a work week. Certain types of employees, however, are exempted from […]